Resources

What Coaching Clients Are Really Asking "The most important things are the hardest to say." Stephen King Maya* is sitting across from me, and she's already told me what she wants from our session. "I just need help with my time," she says. Her hands are wrapped around her coffee cup, knuckles slightly white. "My diary is a disaster. I'm working evenings and weekends. I need strategies. Can we focus on prioritisation today?" I nod. I tell her yes, of course, we can work on that. And then, because I've been doing this long enough to know that the thing in the doorway is rarely the thing in the room, I ask her something else. "Before we get into strategies, can you walk me through a typical week?" She starts listing meetings. The Tuesday executive forum. The Wednesday service delivery working group, which she joined three months ago. A mentoring commitment she took on in February. A piece of work she volunteered for at the last leadership off-site. As she talks, I'm noticing two things at once. The first is her language. Every commitment is described the same way: I said yes to , I took on , I put my hand up for . Active, every time. No one is making her do any of this. The second is her body. When she mentions the working group, her shoulders climb a couple of centimetres toward her ears. When she mentions the off-site project, she looks at the window instead of at me. I make a small choice in that moment. I could pull out a prioritisation framework right now. She'd probably leave the session with a tidy list of things to drop, feel relieved for about a week, and then quietly fill the space back up with something else. I've seen that pattern enough times to recognise where it leads. Instead, I say, "Maya, can I ask you something that might sound a bit out there? Is that okay?" She nods. "What would change for you if the time problem disappeared tomorrow? If I waved a magic wand and your diary suddenly had three free days in it. What would that be like?" She opens her mouth. Closes it again. Looks at her coffee. This is the moment. In the work of Sidney Jourard, the Canadian psychologist whose 1971 book The Transparent Self shaped how we understand disclosure, this is the threshold where someone decides whether the conversation stays in the safe outer layer or moves toward something more honest. Jourard argued that genuine growth in any helping relationship depends on the practitioner creating enough safety for the person to risk going deeper. Irwin Altman and Dalmas Taylor, in their Social Penetration Theory (1973), described it as peeling back layers of an onion: people only move from the surface toward their core self when they assess that the rewards of disclosure outweigh the perceived costs. Trust is the threshold. And right now Maya is doing the calculation. I wait. I don't fill the silence. I've learned, slowly and not without effort, that the urge to rescue a client from a pause is almost always about my discomfort, not theirs. After what feels like a long time but is probably eight seconds, she says, very quietly, "I think I'd feel scared." There it is. The doorway has just opened. "Tell me about scared," I say. And then it comes. Not all at once, but in pieces. A colleague who was promoted ahead of her last year. How she'd told herself it was fine, but something had shifted afterwards. How she started saying yes to everything, partly to prove she was indispensable, partly because the busyness drowned out a quieter, more uncomfortable question: what if I'm not actually that good? How the working group, the mentoring, the offsite project, were all answers to a question she'd never let herself ask out loud. Maya isn't struggling with time management. Maya is trying to outwork a wound. I sit with that for a moment, with her, before I say anything. Because the temptation now is to start solving the new problem. To offer reassurance about her competence, to recommend a self-worth exercise, to do the coach equivalent of patting her hand. None of which would honour what she's just trusted me with. What Barry Farber's research on disclosure in psychotherapy ( Self-Disclosure in Psychotherapy , 2006) shows clearly is that the moment after a meaningful disclosure is delicate. How the practitioner responds determines whether the client goes further or quietly retreats back to the outer layer and never tries again. So I keep it simple. "That took courage to say," I tell her. "Thank you. Can we stay here for a bit before we go anywhere else?" She nods. Her shoulders drop. We don't get to time management strategies in this session. We don't need to. The conversation we're having now is the one that will really help to create change, and the diary will start to sort itself once the underlying driver is understood. Not always quickly, not always neatly, but it will move. I've watched it happen enough times to trust the process. As I reflect on Maya's session, I want to pass on something to anyone reading this who leads people. You don't need to be a coach to do what just happened in that room. You need to do three things, and none of them are technical. Resist the urge to solve in the first ninety seconds. The fix you reach for at minute one is almost always a fix for the wrong problem. Stay curious for one question longer than feels natural. You might ask: What would change if this disappeared? What's the cost beyond the obvious one? What would you most want me to understand? Pick whichever one fits and use it. Be willing to sit with someone in silence long enough that the real thing can be said . Amy Edmondson's work on psychological safety ( The Fearless Organization , 2018) shows that team members only raise the real issue when they trust the response will not cost them. That trust is built in moments exactly like this one. Not in retreats. Not in the values posters. In the four minutes you choose to give someone instead of the four-second answer you were about to offer. Maya came in with a question about her calendar. The question behind it was about her worth. Those are two very different conversations, and only one of them was ever going to change anything. The hardest part of this work, and the most important, is being willing to find out which conversation you're actually in. If this resonated, I'd love to hear from you. What's a time you discovered the real issue was different from the one you came in with - either as a client, a coach, or a leader holding space for someone on your team? References Altman, I. & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships . Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth . Wiley. Farber, B. A. (2006). Self-Disclosure in Psychotherapy . Guilford Press. Jourard, S. M. (1971). The Transparent Self (Rev. ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold. *Name changed to protect confidentiality.

Let me start with a confession: When I first heard about “leadership coaching,” I pictured someone in an expensive suit telling executives to “think outside the box” while charging consulting fees that could fund a small apartment. The expensive suit part? Sometimes accurate. Everything else? Not even close. Leadership coaching has evolved into one of the most evidence-backed, ROI-positive interventions available to organisations today. And if you’re leading a team, building a company, or trying to figure out why your highly talented staff keeps walking out the door, it’s worth understanding what this actually is and why it matters. What Is Leadership Coaching, Really? At its core, leadership coaching is a structured, confidential partnership between a trained coach and a leader, designed to unlock that leader’s potential, enhance their effectiveness, and ultimately drive better outcomes for their team and organisation. Think of it less like a guru dispensing wisdom from a mountaintop, and more like having a thinking partner who asks the questions you’re not asking yourself. The good stuff happens when a leader realises, mid-sentence: “Wait… am I actually the bottleneck here?” Unlike training (where someone teaches you skills) or mentoring (where someone more experienced guides you based on their own path), coaching is: Personalised to your specific context and challenges Action-oriented with genuine accountability Future-focused rather than dwelling on past mistakes Question-driven rather than advice-giving The Evidence: When the Researchers Started Paying Attention Here’s where it gets interesting. Leadership coaching isn’t just feel-good corporate theatre. The research is increasingly compelling: The Manchester Review Study (2001), conducted with 100 executives, found that coaching generated an average ROI of nearly 600%. When the broader benefits to the organisation were considered, that figure jumped to over 700%. Not too shabby for “soft skills.” Harvard Business Review research has consistently shown that leaders who receive coaching demonstrate significant improvements in: Goal attainment (70-80% improvement) Relationship quality with direct reports Organisational commitment Work-life balance (yes, really) A Metropolitan State University study, published in 2009, found that while training alone improved productivity by 22%, training combined with coaching increased productivity by 88%. That’s not a typo. The difference between giving someone tools and helping them actually use those tools effectively is profound. Stanford’s Executive Coaching Project revealed that nearly 100% of coached leaders and their stakeholders reported being satisfied with the coaching experience, with measurable improvements in business management, teamwork, and relationships with direct reports. More recently, the International Coaching Federation’s Global Consumer Study found that 80% of people who receive coaching report increased self-confidence, and over 70% benefit from improved work performance, relationships, and communication skills. How Leadership Coaching Actually Helps For Individual Leaders This year, I worked with a brilliant senior executive in the Australian Public Service - let’s call her Kate - who was drowning. Fifteen-hour days, endless emails and Teams messages, a team that couldn’t seem to make decisions without her. She’d been promoted based on technical excellence but hadn't learned to lead at scale. Through coaching, Kate discovered she was unconsciously creating dependency. Every time someone came to her with a problem, she’d solve it (because she could do it faster). Her team learned not to think independently. Within three months of shifting her approach - asking more questions, delegating with genuine authority, creating space for others to fail and learn - her reactive workload dropped by roughly 30%, and her team’s throughput increased. Leadership coaching helps individuals: Gain self-awareness about blind spots and impact on others Navigate transitions (new role, new industry, scaling up) Develop emotional intelligence and interpersonal effectiveness Build strategic thinking capabilities Manage stress and prevent burnout through better systems and boundaries For Teams When a leader changes, the ripple effects are immediate. Kate's team didn’t just become more autonomous; they became more engaged. Retention improved. Innovation picked up because people felt safe to experiment. The research from Google’s Project Aristotle (their massive study on team effectiveness) found that psychological safety is the number 1 factor in team performance. Coaching helps leaders create that environment. Teams benefit from leadership coaching through: Improved communication patterns and reduced misunderstandings Higher trust levels when leaders model vulnerability and growth Better conflict resolution as leaders learn to facilitate rather than avoid Increased accountability through clearer expectations and follow-through Enhanced collaboration when leaders understand team dynamics For Organisations Here’s the business case that gets CFOs interested: A study in The International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring (2012) found that executive coaching resulted in: 48% improvement in management skills 53% increase in productivity 39% improvement in customer satisfaction 43% increase in employee satisfaction Pricewaterhouse Coopers conducted a survey revealing that the median ROI for companies investing in coaching was seven times the initial investment. For every dollar spent, seven dollars came back in the form of increased productivity, better leadership, improved retention, and other benefits. Organisations see returns through: Reduced turnover among high-potential talent (replacing a senior leader can cost 2-3x their annual salary) Faster onboarding of new leaders into complex roles Culture change that actually sticks because it’s modelled from the top Succession planning that develops internal talent rather than constantly buying it Better decision-making as leaders learn to think more systemically The Real-World Messy Middle Not every coaching engagement ends with a promotion and a TED Talk. Sometimes coaching reveals that someone is genuinely in the wrong role. I once coached a leader who realised through our work that they’d been chasing a version of success their parents wanted, not the one they wanted. They left leadership entirely, started a small business, and last I heard, they’re thriving. That’s still a win. Better that realisation happens through structured reflection than five years and a stress-induced health crisis later. Other times, the challenge is organisational. No amount of coaching will fix a leader who’s set up to fail by impossible demands, toxic cultures, or contradictory expectations. Good coaching sometimes means helping someone see that clearly and make informed choices. What Leadership Coaching Isn’t Let me be clear about what you’re NOT getting: Therapy (we’re not unpacking your childhood, though self-awareness is part of the work) Consulting (a coach won’t do your strategic planning for you) Magic (real change requires real work and real time) One-size-fits-all (cookie-cutter approaches miss the point entirely) The Bottom Line Leadership is learned, not born. And like any complex skill, having someone help you see your own patterns, challenge your assumptions, and experiment with new approaches dramatically accelerates growth. The research is clear: leadership coaching delivers measurable returns. The ROI data is compelling. But beyond the numbers, there’s something deeper. Leaders who are coached become better at developing others, creating a multiplier effect that compounds over time. In a world where the half-life of skills is shrinking and the pace of change is accelerating, the ability to learn and adapt isn’t a nice-to-have. It’s the competitive advantage. So whether you’re a CEO wondering why your leadership team isn’t clicking, a mid-level manager feeling stuck, or an HR professional building development programs, leadership coaching deserves a serious look. Not because it’s trendy, but because it works. And if nothing else, imagine having someone whose job is to help you think more clearly about the problems that keep you up at night. In my experience, that alone is worth the investment. What has been your experience with leadership coaching - as a coach, coachee, or observer? I’d love to hear your stories. Interested in hiring a coach to support your leadership challenges in 2026? 📩 Email: tania@advantagecoaching.com.au or schedule a clarity call.